Luther removed books from the Bible because he believed they did not align with his understanding of Christian doctrine and were not consistent with his interpretation of Scripture. He rejected several books from the Old Testament, referred to as the Apocrypha, as well as the New Testament book of James.
And now take a closer look
Luther’s decision to remove books from the Bible was driven by his theological convictions and his reformational efforts to redefine the canon of Scripture. He believed that certain books did not align with his understanding of Christian doctrine and were not consistent with his interpretation of Scripture. Luther’s reforming work ultimately led to the exclusion of seven Old Testament books, commonly referred to as the Apocrypha, as well as the New Testament book of James.
Luther’s opposition to these books was mainly based on two key factors. First, he questioned their canonicity, arguing that they lacked the same level of authority as the rest of the books in the Bible. Second, he found that their teachings contradicted his theological positions, particularly regarding justification by faith alone.
One notable quote that captures Luther’s perspective on the books he removed is from his preface to the New Testament in his German translation of the Bible: “Therefore St. James’ epistle is really an epistle of straw, compared to these others, for it has nothing of the nature of the gospel about it.” Luther’s strong opposition to the book of James was rooted in his belief that it placed too much emphasis on human works, rather than faith.
Interesting facts on the topic:
- Luther’s translation of the Bible into German played a crucial role in the spread of the Protestant Reformation by making Scripture more accessible to the common people.
- The books of the Apocrypha are still included in the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox canons of Scripture.
- Not all Protestant reformers agreed with Luther’s decision to exclude certain books. For instance, the Church of England retained the Apocrypha in its official canon.
- Luther’s translation work also influenced subsequent English translations, such as the King James Version, which incorporated some of his wording choices.
- Despite his disagreements with certain books, Luther did not entirely reject them. He included them in his Bible but separated them from the rest, referring to them as “useful and good for reading” but not on the same level as the rest of Scripture.
Table:
| Books Removed by Luther |
|---|
| Tobit |
| Judith |
| Wisdom of Solomon |
| Sirach (Ecclesiasticus) |
| Baruch |
| 1 Maccabees |
| 2 Maccabees |
Please note that the table provided is for illustrative purposes and may not be a comprehensive list of all the books Luther excluded.
See related video
Contrary to the claim that Martin Luther removed books from the Bible, he actually retained the apocryphal books in his German translation but placed them in a separate section. Luther recognized the lack of canonicity and authority in these books but still included them for Christian edification. He provided prefaces to make them more accessible and even preached on apocryphal texts, emphasizing the fear of God and righteousness as faith. Luther’s intention was to read these books in an evangelical framework, interpreting them correctly and acknowledging their absence of certain doctrines.
Other methods of responding to your inquiry
Martin Luther did not remove any books from the Bible. The books in question were separated from the Bible as a result of the Reformation, but they had been subject of intense debate from the time of Jesus and were not considered Scripture by the Jewish people. Luther believed that these books did not fit with his interpretation of Christianity, and thus chose to exclude them from the Bible.
Martin Luther did not remove any books from the Bible. This claim is inaccurate and misleading. The books in question were separated from the Bible as a result of the Reformation. That is true. But they had been subject of intense debate from the time of Jesus. They were not considered Scripture by the Jewish people.
The removal of the 7 books from the Bible by Martin Luther is an important part of the Reformation and its legacy. Luther believed that these books did not fit with his interpretation of Christianity, and thus chose to exclude them from the Bible.
You will most likely be intrigued
Did Luther remove books from the Bible?
The answer is: Luther included the deuterocanonical books in his translation of the German Bible, but he did relocate them to after the Old Testament, calling them "Apocrypha, that are books which are not considered equal to the Holy Scriptures, but are useful and good to read."
Similar
Why were the 7 books removed from the Bible?
Response: The Septuagint was the authoritative Jewish scriptures of the Second Temple Judaism from which the early Christians emerged from, hence the Christian Bible contained these deuterocanonical books until Martin Luther, assuming the Masoretic text to be the original, removed them to match this new Jewish canon.
Why did they remove books from the Bible?
The Confession provided the rationale for the exclusion: ‘The books commonly called Apocrypha, not being of divine inspiration, are no part of the canon of the Scripture, and therefore are of no authority in the church of God, nor to be any otherwise approved, or made use of, than other human writings’ (1.3).
What were the books rejected by Luther?
Response will be: Accordingly, Luther placed four rejected books (Hebrews, James, Revelation and Jude) at the end of his translation, and he was followed in this by both Tyndale and Coverdale – although the King James Version permitted no such doubts. Viewed from the modern world, though, such theological caution seems misplaced.
Did Martin Luther remove books from the Bible?
Martin Luther did not remove any books from the Bible. This claim is inaccurate and misleading. The books in question were separated from the Bible as a result of the Reformation. That is true. But they had been subject of intense debate from the time of Jesus. They were not considered Scripture by the Jewish people.
Why did Martin Luther throw out the Bible?
Response to this: Luther claimed they celebrated Judaism and because he wanted to justify his challenging the authority of the Catholic Church, he threw them out. The Protestant Bible consists of only 66 books ― 39 books in the Old Testament and 27 books in the New Testament.
Why did Protestants rewrite Luther’s books?
Subsequent Protestants, deciding that Luther wasn’t really inspired by the Holy Spirit, replaced most of the books he had removed. In the third and fourth century, amid a flurry of gnostic nonsense producing dubious gospels left and right, the Council of Nicaea met to determine which books were canon. Some of them were easy to detect.
Why did Martin Luther dislike the Book of James?
Answer to this: Martin Luther, the celebrated catalyst of the Protestant Reformation, famously took issue with the book of James. He didn’t think it expressed the “nature of the Gospel,” it appeared to contradict Paul’s statements about justification by faith, and it didn’t directly mention Christ.