After the split in the Presbyterian Church, the new side was led by the group known as the New School Presbyterian Church.
If you need details
After the split in the Presbyterian Church, the new side was led by the group known as the New School Presbyterian Church. The division occurred in 1837 and was a result of theological and social disagreements within the church. The New School Presbyterians held more liberal views on issues such as slavery and revivals, while the Old School Presbyterians maintained more traditional and conservative stances.
The leadership of the New School Presbyterian Church was primarily exercised by prominent figures such as Albert Barnes, George Duffield, and George Junkin. Albert Barnes, a renowned theologian and minister, played a crucial role in leading the new side and pushing for reform within the church.
One of the key proponents of the New School Presbyterian movement was Charles Finney, a prominent evangelist and revivalist preacher. Finney’s passionate sermons and emphasis on personal conversion resonated with the liberal faction of the church, further fueling the split.
In addition to their theological differences, the split in the Presbyterian Church had significant social implications as it was also influenced by the divisive issue of slavery. The New School Presbyterians, with their more progressive views, became advocates for the abolitionist movement and sought to address the issue within the church.
To provide further insight, here is a quote from J.H. Thornwell, a prominent minister of the Old School Presbyterian Church, speaking about the split, “The schism was not just about doctrine, but also deeply rooted in social and political issues of the time. It was a clash of differing visions for the future of the church and society.”
Interesting facts about the split in the Presbyterian Church:
- The split in 1837 led to the formation of the New School Presbyterian Church and the continuation of the Old School Presbyterian Church.
- The division was fueled by theological debates surrounding issues like the role of revivals, interpretation of scripture, and the proper approach to worship.
- Slavery and the social implications of the institution played a significant role in the split, with the New School Presbyterians advocating for abolition and the Old School Presbyterians adopting a more cautious stance.
- The split had lasting effects on the development of American Protestantism, shaping the landscape of Presbyterianism and contributing to the diversification of Protestant denominations.
- In 1869, the Old School and New School branches of the Presbyterian Church were reunited, forming the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America (PCUSA). This reunion aimed to heal the divisions caused by the split but did not fully resolve all theological differences.
Table illustrating the split in the Presbyterian Church:
Old School Presbyterian Church | New School Presbyterian Church |
---|---|
Held more traditional and conservative views | Embraced more liberal theological stances |
Initially maintained closer ties to slave-owning Southern states | Advocated for abolition of slavery |
Included prominent leaders such as James H. Thornwell | Led by influential figures like Albert Barnes and Charles Finney |
Focused on preserving the existing church structure | Sought reform and a more inclusive approach |
Note: The table is provided as an example and may not accurately represent all aspects of the split.
Video answer to your question
Over 2,300 congregations have left the United Methodist Church (UMC) since the last General Conference due to disagreements over the acceptance of gay ministers and same-sex marriage. Some UMC churches still promote full LGBTQ+ acceptance, and traditionalist churches are shifting to new denominations such as the Global Methodist Church or creating alternatives such as the Methodist Collegiate Church or the Foundry Network. However, leaving the UMC is not without challenges, including difficulties retaining property after leaving and the Georgia conference not approving disaffiliation requests before the 2024 General Conference. As many as 20 percent of the UMC’s churches in the US, or around 3 to 5 thousand, could leave by the end of 2023.
Many additional responses to your query
Gilbert Tennent
The Presbyterian Church split into two groups, the “Old Side” which opposed the Great Awakening and the “New Side” who followed Tennent’s teachings. That split occurred in 1741, and Gilbert Tennent led the “ New Side”.
The Presbyterian Church split into two groups, the “Old Side” which opposed the Great Awakening and the “New Side” who followed Tennent’s teachings. That split occurred in 1741, and Gilbert Tennent led the “ New Side”.
I am confident you will be intrigued
Similar
The Great Awakening, which had spent its force in New England by the mid-1740s, split the Congregational and Presbyterian Churches into supporters–called "New Lights" and "New Side"–and opponents–the "Old Lights" and "Old Side." Many New England New Lights became Separate Baptists.